英文摘要 |
The methodological approaches to the codification of civil law include not only the organizing order from general rules to particular exceptions, but also the categorizing order of provisions according to the legal requirements for the occurrence, obstacle and extinction of rights and claims. All the three types of provisions are rooted in rights and claims, and present themselves in a systematic structure. This system, together with various forms of expression, such as main clause, proviso, and conditional statement, well defines the distribution of burden of proof. Legal rules must not contradict each other. Making or revising laws need to take into account whether their provisions are in harmonious order. In case contradictions between provisions cannot be eliminated, either ex ante or ex post, they would cancel out each other's effect. It would be best to eliminate contradictions ex ante by applying the mutatis mutandis method. This can also make the provisions more efficient. In reception of a certain foreign law, the law in question needs to be assimilated into domestic legal system. Terms or phrases taken from foreign laws should be translated into equivalent Chinese ones, if possible. When enacting a special regulation, namely treating two same objects with different approaches, lawmakers have the obligation to describe why such a regulation needs to be set. Otherwise the rule would be deemed as capricious. In adopting the model of combining civil and commercial law, such a civil code should differentiate between merchants and non-merchants in application to avoid potential inconsistency. A civil code which is accessible to the people is instrumental in the exercise of civil rights. Laws should be written in plain language, whenever possible. This is to say that civil law should adopt language used in people's daily lives. Time has its influences on people's daily lives, including legal behaviors. Codifying civil law in time sequence can make the law more accessible to the ordinary people. |