「同志權益與性解放無關」？真愛聯盟事件中的同運含蓄政略

＂Gay Rights Have Nothing to Do with Sex Liberation＂? Gay Reticent Politics in the True Love Alliance Event

由宗教右派團體所發起的「真愛聯盟」旨在阻擾教育部原訂自100學年度起於國中及小學高年級實施包含同志教育在內的性平教材，該教材也被真愛聯盟視為鼓勵性解放。為了對抗真愛聯盟，同志社群所投注的運動動能及所動員的規模堪稱史無前例，然而，值得留意的是，在此一事件中，同運團體、運動份子與反性解放的主流／性平女性主義長期交互寄身下的「含蓄政略」，除了充斥著恐／反性解放的修辭外，更透顯一種主流化的趨勢。本文藉由分析同運與主流／性平女性主義的繁複交互寄身關係與效應，直指上述含蓄政略的「反性解放」立場無法成為「反恐同」的利器，它只會鞏固既有的「性階序」，並使得同志平權的理念在既有的性階序內無法充份體現。因此，同運應思索將「性解放肯認」作為一種基進的政略。

The True Love Alliance Event refers to local religious right groups' protest against the distribution of so-called 'gender-equality-education textbooks' which are regarded by these groups as advocating gay rights and sex liberation; the event also refers to local gay, feminist and gender-equality-education groups' resistance against the above religious right activism. This resistance has been deemed by local gay activists as the most crucial and heroic activism in the history of Taiwan gay rights movement. Yet, it needs to be noted that under the influence of mainstream feminism, the resistance is inscribed by a reticent politics against sex liberation. This paper aims to reveal the mainstreaming tendency behind the reticent politics by dint of analyzing the complicated interdependence between gay activism and mainstream / gender-equality-education feminism. It argues that since anti-sex liberation would contribute to re-affirmation of sexual hierarchy and gay rights can't be fully achieved without destroying this sexual hierarchy, local gay activism should develop a radical agendum that includes, rather than excludes, the (re)affirmation of sex liberation.