英文摘要 |
The State Administration of Taxation (SAT) essentially monopolies the power of interpreting tax law in China. This fact fails to conform to the theory of power separation and balance and makes it difficult for SAT to get rid of challenges from the society on its combined role of being an athlete and player at the same time. However, the interpretation power of SAT is formally legal and substantially justified when such power has been analyzed under the Functional Propriety Doctrine and Tax Legal Prescription. Yet, it's necessary to be cautious when the interpretation power of SAT is operated in order to limit the possibility of power abuse and to promote its power maintaining for interpretation in the legitimate limit. Therefore, it's necessary to define pro-taxpayer as the basis standpoint for the interpretation power of SAT. On this basis, legitimate excise of the interpretation power of SAT can be urged on one hand with writing documents as the streamline and on the basis of design of justified procedure; on the other hand, legitimate operation of the interpretation power of SAT can be regulated by centering on supervision against the interpretative documents and establishing a multi-dimensional supervision system. |