英文摘要 |
Introduction: Health-care associated pneumonia is the leading cause of death in patients with hospital acquired infections, and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important part of this. The hygiene of ventilator tubing is considered to be a risk factor; however, the frequency of the need to change the ventilator circuit is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine if it was beneficial to change it weekly rather than the current policy of routine change when the sputum culture turned positive. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study and the data were gathered from a medical center from November 2007 to December 2008. All patients under eighteen years of age who underwent ventilator support were enrolled. Demographic data were retrieved from charts and a review of nursing records. The diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) was determined by the hospital infection control committee. In one group, the ventilator circuit was changed weekly and, in the reference group, it was changed when the sputum culture turned positive. Results: There were 848 person-days in the weekly change group, and 850 person-days in the reference group. The incidence of VAP was 5.9 per 1000 persondays with weekly change and 3.8 per 1000 person-days in the reference group RR=1.71(95% CI 0.41-7.12, P=0.46). Conclusion: Routine weekly change of the ventilator circuit had no significant effect on the prevention of VAP. Tubing should still be changed once it is contaminated. Further prospective and larger scale studies are needed to determine the optimal interval for changing circuits. |