中文期刊所刊載日本研究論文的體裁分析－－以人文科學領域論文的緒論和結論為中心

Genre Analysis of Japan's Research Papers Published in Chinese Journals: Centering on the Introduction and Conclusion in the Fields of Humanities Sciences

本文抽取中國外語類核心期刊2000~2013年度所刊載日語語言學、日本文學、日本社會文化研究等人文科學領域的研究論文90篇，對緒論和結論的結構進行了體裁分析。通過研究，揭示出［A研究對象和背景的說明→C研究目的和行動的提示］為中文期刊論文緒論典型的語篇模式。同時，［A研究對象和背景的說明→B先行研究的提示和檢討→C研究目的和行動的提示］模式和［A研究對象和背景的說明］模式也較為多見。與日語論文相比，中文期刊論文緒論呈現出更強的傾向性和簡單化趨勢。先行研究的出現率在各領域呈現出顯著差異。同時，結論部分雖未見典型的邏輯展開類型，但是其依賴語言表現等手段與緒論相呼應，從而有效維持了論文整體論證邏輯的連貫性。本文對擴大日本人文科學研究論文體裁特點的認知具有一定價值，為學術日語研究和中文母語日語學習者的畢業論文指導獲得了一定的啟示。

This article analyzes the genre of the introduction and conclusion of 90research papers on Japanese humanities, especially. Japanese linguistics, literature, society and culture, published in Chinese core journals on foreign language studies during 2000-2013. This article reveals that the typical discursive patterns of the introductory moves of these research papers in Chinese journals include: [A) description of the research object and background-＞ C) statement of the research purposes and outline]. Besides, the pattern that includes both [A) description of the research object and background-＞ B) discussion of previous studies-＞ C) statement of the research purposes and outline] is also very common. So is the pattern that only includes A). Compared with those of Japanese journal papers, the prefaces of Chinese journal articles tend to be more goal-oriented and simplified. Also, the emergence rate of Move B showed significant difference in different fields. Moreover, althoughthere is no typical discursive pattern in conclusions, these research papers relies on language performance and other strategies echoing the introduction, which effectively maintain the overall logic of the research papers. Therefore, this article is of great value in enriching the study of the preface genre of academic papers on Japanese humanities. It also provides a theoretical basis for the supervision of the graduation theses of Japanese major.