英文摘要 |
This paper discusses the two major types of hexagram alternation principles proposed to explain the relationship between hexagrams in the I Ching: rise-and-descent and opposition. The major proponents of the rise-and-descent approach are Yu Fan, Chu Hsi, Li Chih-ts'ai, and Wu Ch'eng; the major opponent of this approach is Yu Yen. As an heir to the eight-hexagram generation-change theory of the Ching Fang school and to Hsun Shuang's rise-and-descent theory, Yu Fan proposed a six-hexagram rise-and-descent theory based on the alternation of one yao line. However, his theory has a serious limitation, in that it must admit exceptions to its general principle. Li Chih-ts'ai's Hsiang-sheng Diagram offers two ways of mapping hexagram alternation, by alternation in either one yao line or two yao lines, but his theory is unsatisfactory in that it provides no single general principle of alternation. Chu Hsi's Kua-pien Diagram is broader in scope than either Yu's or Li's theory. It models hexagram alternation by ten hexagrams and aims to offer a comprehensive account of all possibilities of alternation. In contrast to the rise-and-descent principle, which explains alternation between hexagrams through the alternation of yao lines within the hexagrams, the principle of opposition explains hexagram alternation mainly by appeal to opposition and correspondence between entire hexagrams. The limitation of this approach is that it establishes no general principle for hexagram alternation. Wu Ch'eng's theory distinguishes hexagrams into those that alternate according to a pattern of ten rise-and-descent hexagrams and those that alternate according to six descendent hexagrams. He categorizes hexagrams clearly on the basis of their yin-yang characteristics and internal and external structure. This paper proposes three criteria for a satisfactory theory of hexagram alternation and concludes that among theories proposed from the Han-Wei to the Sung-Yuan eras, Wu Ch'eng's theory best fulfills these criteria. |