客觀歸責論再批判與我國刑法過失論的完善

A Further Criticism on Theory of Objective Attribution and Perfection of Criminal Negligence in China

我國刑法學界在如何完善過失論的問題上，存在激烈爭論。儘管客觀歸責論對過失論的發展作出了重要貢獻，但其自身在方法論上也存在許多不足。客觀歸責論與傳統過失論在方法論上既有聯繫，又有區別，因此，並未構成對其全面超越。批判客觀歸責論本身，並不等於完全否定客觀歸責方法論。我國刑法過失論不應存在路徑依賴，在適當借鑒客觀歸責方法論的基礎上，即使不全面引入客觀歸責論，也能合理追究過失犯的刑事責任。我國學者對新過失論的批判不能成立，它比修正的舊過失論更為可取。我國刑法理論應以新過失論為主線，使之貫穿過失犯刑事政策學、過失犯總論和過失犯各論，通過完善過失論體系，強化過失的規範認定。

There is fierce debate over how to perfect theory of criminal negligence in China. Although theory of objective attribution made important contributions to it development, it has serious defects in methodology. There are some connections and differences between theory of objective attribution and traditional theories of criminal negligence. Criticizing theory of objective attribution itself doesn't deny the methodology of objective attribution completely. The theory of criminal negligence in China doesn't exist path dependence, it should appropriately learn from methodology of objective attribution rather than introducing itself totally to reasonably investigate criminal liability of negligence crime. New theory of criminal negligence is more desirable than modified old theory of criminal negligence. Criminal jurisprudence in China should take new theory of criminal negligence as a main line, make it embedded in criminal policy, general provisions as well as specific provisions of negligence crime, so as to perfect the system of negligence theory and strengthen normative identification of negligence.