羈押必要性審查制度實效研究

The Research on Practice Effect about the Review of the Necessity of Custody

刑事訴訟法修改後，除審查逮捕時的羈押必要性審查外，捕後羈押必要性審查工作處於虛置狀態，往往只有刑事和解的案件才在捕後變更逮捕。“程式虛置”的原因是檢察機關缺乏開展工作的動力，受制於公安機關、被害人、法院以及公眾輿論壓力，同時也因為審查缺乏明確的羈押事實標準及證明制度，權力缺乏來自辯方的有效制約。改革的方向應當是建立檢察院開展羈押必要性審查的動力機制，確立明晰的羈押事實標準，建立量化評估及證明制度，優化訴訟結構。

After the new criminal procedure law is carried, the review of the necessity of post-arrestment custody is not fully working except on arrestment. It violats the legislative goals of reducing the rate of pretrial-custody significantly. The reason is that procuratorial organs is lack of motivation, the work is hindered by the external pressure from the police, the victim, the court and public opinion, the review process is lack of clear standard and proof system, and the procedure is short of effective restriction from the defense. We should establish the incentive mechanism for procuratorial agencies, clear the custody standard and proof system.