影響兩岸簽署「ECFA」協議之研究－－以PAM為架構

The Study on the Influential Factors of Singing ECFA with the PAM

本研究以公共事務管理架構（PAM）為分析架構，並運用社會判斷理論（SJT）分析不同群體對兩岸簽署「ECFA」各項協議之認知及其衝突來源，並提出化解衝突的政策建議。分析結果發現，不同群體的判斷原則不同，以整體而言，群體認為影響兩岸簽署「ECFA」各項協議最大的是「社會因素」（26.69），其次依序為「政府因素」（25.16）、「經濟因素」（25.14）、「政治因素」（19.32）。但群體內對於「政府因素」（60.85）的影響程度的認知歧異最大，其次依序為「經濟因素」（58.93）、「社會因素」（51.62）、「政治因素」（50.76）。此外，不同群體對於影響兩岸簽署「ECFA」的影響的認知仍有不同，其依序，分別為1.政府官員：政治因素、政府因素、社會因素、經濟因素。2.企業廠商：社會因素、經濟因素、政府因素、政治因素。3.一般民眾：經濟因素、政府因素、社會因素、政治因素。

This study was based on the framework of PAM (Public Affairs Management) and Social Judgment Theory (SJT) to analyze different groups' cognitions and sources of conflict upon Taiwan and China's signing the ECFA (Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement), and thereby suggest the conflict-resolving polices. The results found that the principles of judgment varied among different groups. In general, groups thought that 'social factors' (26.69) most greatly affected the singing of ECFA most, followed by 'governmental factors' (25.16), 'economic factors' (25.14) and 'political factors' (19.32). Prior to 'economic factors' (58.93), 'social factors' (51.62) and 'political factors' (50.76), 'governmental factors (60.85) however showed the greatest within-group difference regarding the impact of singing ECFA. Furthermore, the findings of between- group cognitions upon Taiwan and China's signing the ECFA were different. The different groups' rankings of influential factors were listed in the order of increased impact as follows. 1. Government officials: political, governmental, social and economic factors; 2. Corporations: social, economic, governmental, and political factors; 3. Citizens: economic, governmental, social and political factors.