英文摘要 |
At the heart of insider trading cases lies the issue of defining the materiality of nonpublic information. The Securities Exchange Law of 1968 (“the Exchange Law') and regulations of the Financial Supervision Commission, however, remain indeterminate on the issue. Judicial decisions are applying different criteria to similar cases, resulting in uncertainly and inequality for the insider trading law enforcement. This article discusses laws pertinent to the issue in the United States and in the European Union, and examines the Exchange Law and the relevant court decisions in Taiwan. The auther concludes that nonpublic information becomes material when a reasonable investor would consider it significant in making an investment decision. |