英文摘要 |
This meta-analysis of 27 studies reviews the current empirical evidence for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) in affecting students with autism in communication, speech production, and the key factors which influence the effect of speech production. A systematic review of the literature on AAC was conducted. Effect sizes of PND and IRD were aggregated separately for single-subjects studies for communication and speech outcomes. Then compute the differences between group subjects by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test. Results in meta-analysis indicated that the effects of AAC is a promising but not yet established evidenced-based intervention for facilitate communication in children with autism. The key factor depends on developing the ability of echolalia in their early childhood. |