英文摘要 |
Humboltian Science have attracted renewed attention due to environmental approaches that take both human and natural factors into account. Drawing on biographical information about the Danish botanist and geographer Joachim Friedrik Schouw (1789-1852), a follower of Humboldtian Science, this paper aims at exploring sociopolitical factors underiying his ideas of phytogeography, his cartographical representation of the global plant distribution with 22 phyto-geographic regions, his high regard for economic plants, as well as his affinity toward studying plant ecology. Humboldtian Science, named after the Prussian naturalist Alxeander von Humboldt (1769-1859), denotes a way of inquiry into nature. It is characterized by making connections between empirically approved natural phenomena, like temperature, latitude, ground level elevation of mountains and human activities, like financial power, mineral reserves of countries, in order to explore the underiying principles of existing natural phenomena. It stands for the mainstream way of scientific investigation in Europe until the end of the 19(superscript th) century and attracts today a worldwide focus especially in relation to environmental research. Schouw is recognized in science for the publication of ”Principles of Phytogeography” in 1823 and of the 12 maps of plant distribution attached to it one year later. His approaches to mapping, as well as his dues to clarifying and developing novel terminology, like phytogeographic regions (Pflanzenreich in Gerrnan), to describe phytogeographical concepts have turn phytogeography toward a scientific discipline. In addition, Schouw's innovative approach to mapping the amount of plants by way of color density become standard for maps of biogeographical distribution.In spite of the reputation that Schouw was awarded in science history, links between his professional work and other parts of his life are not well known. However, in recent studies biographical information of scientists is considered more important because it enables contextualizing scientific concepts in appropriated sociopolitical contexts and hence improves the proper interpretation of scientific concepts in history of science. |