反壟斷司法的知識生產－－一個知識社會學的視角

Knowledge Production in Judicial Enforcement of Antitrust Law: From the Perspective of Sociology of Knowledge

法院能否勝任反壟斷法的實施任務、塑造自身應有的制度角色？從技術視角看，關鍵取決於其是否適應反壟斷濃重的專業化底色，能否在知識維度證成自己的司法能力。從知識社會學的進路切入，確立反壟斷司法的知識生產觀，是強化反壟斷司法的技術理性的可欲努力。在當前行政中心主義之下，反壟斷法實施的知識分佈呈現出高度不對稱狀態，知識生產幾乎壓倒性地集中於行政機關，造成“司法疲軟”。應當通過發揮指導性案例制度的誘導功能、營造基於分工的知識生產空間、建構知識生產的民主合作機制，激勵法官在裁判中遵循基於法律原則的推理、基於經濟學理論的推理、基於法律實用主義哲學的推理等知識生產的內在機理，鍛造出反壟斷法實施的“無言之知”。與此同時，從中生發出足以填充、豐富反壟斷法文本的規範意涵的規則知識，推動反壟斷法經由司法實踐不斷發展自身規則體系。

Whether courts in China's judicial system are qualified to perform the task of antitrust law enforcement, and then form their institutional roles? From the technological perspective, it depends greatly on their capabilities of adapting themselves to the significantly professional characteristics, and of justifying themselves in knowledge dimension. Taking an approach of sociology of knowledge and establishing the knowledge-producing outlook are desirable efforts of enhancing technological rationalities. For the pervasiveness of administrative centralism, the knowledge distribution of antitrust law enforcement is so asymmetrical that the knowledge production is overwhelmingly centered on the relevant administrative bodies, resulting in judicial weakness. As a type of effective institutional response, it's vital to stimulate judges to satisfy the inherent requirements of reasoning on legal principles, on economic theories, and on legal pragmatism in the knowledge production process by making full use of the current guiding case system as an incentive means, constructing the knowledge-producing space based on labor division, and designing the democratic cooperation mechanism of knowledge production for the sake of producing tacit knowledge concerning antitrust law enforcement. Meanwhile, the rule knowledge can also be produced effectively so as to enrich the normative implications of the text of antitrust law, and promote the ceaseless development of antitrust law's rule system through judicial practice.