英文摘要 |
The Criminal Procedure Law amended in 2012 added electronic data to the types of evidence admitted by law, which requires the criminal procedural law academics to conduct an intensive study on the relevant issues about electronic data, such as search and seizure, introduction and cross examination, review and judgment of electronic data. Compared with traditional evidences, electronic data has four major characteristics as follows: capacity of massive storage, volatility of form, detectability of alteration and difficulty of perception. The above characteristics raise strict requirements on the search and seizure of electronic data. Firstly, investigation organs must get the warrants issued by judicial organs before search and seizure, besides, no matter the search aimed at electronic devices, or the search aimed at electronic data stored in the electronic devices, it should be bound by the probable cause requirement and particularity requirement of the writ principle. Secondly ,in order to protect the legal rights of the defendants and to prevent the investigation power being abused, the investigation organs must offer opportunities for the defendants to check, examine and copy electronic data after search and seizure. Thirdly, for the sake of objectivity and originality of the electronic data, rigorous system of custody chain must be established. There exist serious problems in all of the above aspects, and even deficiency in some aspects in our system. The legislation organ must reform and reconstruct the relevant system in the future. |