英文摘要 |
Sir John Fortescue was a prestigious political theorist of England in the 15th century, and In Praise of the laws of England was one of his articles at old age. In comparison with another contemporary work, i. e., The Prince, they were all political theory Manuals on educating the prince, but the key difference between them was that, in The Prince Machiavelli told the prince how to rule the kingdom by “new morality”, but in In Praise of the laws of England Fortescue modeled a new king by the law. In the article, Fortescue simulated a dialogue between Lord Chancellor and the Prince. The whole conversation focused on fifteen questions from the Prince, by which Lord Chancellor gave the prince a systematic training on the laws of England. During the process, Lord Chancellor figured out a model of king by telling the prince why and how to learn the law, and clarified the relationship between the royalty and the rule of law by interpreting the “political dominion and royal dominion”, and emphasized the prominent function on cultivating the nobles and common people by comparing the civil law and the laws of England. In this article, Fortescue had been striving to find a rational approach of combining the royalty and the rule of law so that on one hand the royal power could be consolidated, and on the other hand the rule of law could be carried through. Although his concept was not fulfilled in his life time, a subtle paradox between the king and law emerged in the coming Tudor’s reign. |