英文摘要 |
“Right of Self-determination” is prevalent in various fields and contexts in Contemporary Japan. The private-law perspective shows us three different types of the right: 1) the right to loosen some social relations coerced by mandatory legal norms (or public Order), 2) the right to secure the sphere of individual freedom against the state and intermediate groups such as business organizations and schools, and 3) the right to narrow the Information gap among contract parties. The first type of the right of Self-determination is studied in this article. Three concrete examples are discussed here: 1) the prospective amendment of family law to make the range of personal choice on family wider, especially the controversial termination of one-surname-for-one-family policy, 2) the wardship for majors which was established with the ideal of harmony between self-determination and protection, 3) the right of self-determination concerned with brain death and organ plant. Analysis of these examples reveals that the‘right of self-determination’referred to there is different from the ordinary legal rights infringement of which is by definition unlawful. The legitimate alleviation of coercive power of public order needs therefore more than just employment of the right of self-determination. It eventually depends on whether the public order is justifiable or not. It proposes then in conclusion the distinction between political public-order and protective public-order. While alleviation of the former is expected for the regard of the right of self-determination, the latter should be held sound. |