英文摘要 |
This study employs two proxy variables for private information as a non-synchronized and unconditional probability of information-based trading in a discussion of the joint determinants between CEO risk-taking decisions and private information flows. We find that the determinants are CEO pay-performance sensitivities, corporate governance scores and exogenous variables while using of the simultaneous equation and a seemingly unrelated regression to prove the privation information flow and learning effect hypotheses. Nevertheless, in terms of the entrenchment effect and the extent of how risk-taking decisions lead to private information flows, the evidence suggests that there is moderating effect between corporate governance and risk-taking decisions associated with private information flow. This contributes to explaining the arguments and different insights of Chan and Chan (2014), Ferreira and Laux (2007) and Durnev et al. (2004). We find that market or institutional investors are inclined to monitor frequency of trading because of the influence on risk-taking decisions of the control of stock return variation. CEO risk-taking decisions are associated with private benefits and principal-principal agency problems which positively lead to idiosyncratic volatility and unconditional trading on the basis of corporate governance. The learning effect hypothesis is evidenced, indicating that CEO risk-taking decisions rapidly absorb stock return variation while learning of trading-frequency due to corporate governance. |