| 中文摘要 |
傳統規範結構理論在解釋侵權法上抗辨事由的內涵時遭遇了困難，而通過對構成要件的性質以及抗辨事由與法效果之間關係的重新論證，可以將抗辨事由定義為評論妨礙事實的抽象總結，這種方法不僅有助於對抗辨事由的外延的確定，而且也有助於侵權法領域的證明責任之明晰。It is difficult for the conventional theory of the structure of the legal norm to explain the meaning of the defenses in tort law. After demonstrating the relationship between the defenses and the legal effects, we can define the defenses as the abstraction and summarization of the facts that can deny a positive evaluation. This conclusion is useful to define the scope of the defenses, and to clarify the allocation of the burden of proof in tort law. |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
