中文摘要 |
在民事糾紛解決的合意形成機制中,存在著某些相互矛盾的現象,造成合意的方法在實際運行中出現理想與現實相互脫節的情形。對此,與其在理論上各執一詞,不如從當事人的角度觀察,可能會得出更加符合實際的結論。其中,自願與強制是一對客觀存在的矛盾體,它們既互相排斥,又彼此依存;合意動機的不同,會影響當事人對於合意的態度和合意的效果;事實與責任在客觀上構成了合意的形成基礎;而在合意與決定之間始終存在著不可逾越的界限。Some conflicting phenomena always exist in consensus formation mechanism of civil disputes resolving, which result in a situation caused by consensual approach disjointed between ideal situation and reality in ac-tual operation. Faced with these contradictory phenomena, more realistic conelusions may be drawn by vie-wing from the perspective of the party than in theory uncompromising. Voluntary and mandatory of consensus is a contradiction objective existence, which are both mutually exclusive and interdependent. Due to the dif-ferent consensus motivations, a different kind of state will appear on the performance, the intrinsic motiva-tion often determines the consensus effect, facts and responsibilities objectively form the basis of consensus,and an insurmountable strict boundary between the consensus and the decision. |