英文摘要 |
Many scholars think that local militaries in the Han Dynasty are just composed of Crossbowman (Caiguan) or Cavalryman (Qishi). However, we can still explore this problem with the differentiation between two military service systems based on the concept of specialized soldiers proposed by Osamu Oba, Takeyuki Takamura etc. The way that elite soldiers were selected during the Warring States period could be the origin of Crossbowman and Cavalryman in the Han Dynasty. Therefore, they can be called specialized soldiers. Specialized soldiers’ superiority and professionalism can be confirmed from the selection criteria, various kinds of training of military skills and some relevant supporting institutions. On the other hand, conscripts who fail to meet the selection criteria will be general soldiers. Due to their non-professional feature, general soldiers are always assigned to ordinary security guarding services of public sites such as local government offices, public facilities etc. They are called official security guards. Additionally, they are also engaged in temporary labor tasks. Consequently, general soldiers have three properties which are military, official and labor services respectively. As far as serving features, general and specialized soldiers can be separately classified as general labor-military service and specialized military service, so that the structure of the serving systems can be reinterpreted. The differentiation of the serving feature based on the professional military skills can be demonstrated not only on the usage situation on two words “Shi (士)” and “Zu (卒)”, but also on the identity differences between general and specialized soldiers from some institutions, such as appointment and removal of personnel, litigation proceedings ,and property of examination. To sum up, local militaries in the Han Dynasty are composed of specialized and general soldiers who can be distinguished by professional military skills. In fact, the differentiation between two military service systems can be further considered as one part of universal service differentiation of officials. The phenomena that people serve for officials according to their skills or abilities may be another great issue of the serving institution. |