英文摘要 |
The purposes of this study were to explore the quality of life on youth with physical disabilities and sensory impairments from the psychological aspects. The Quality of Psychological Life Scale (QPLS) was used to investigate 270 youth with physical disabilities and sensory impairments aged from 16 to 30 in Taiwan. Following the investigation, the qualitative study was adopted to elaborate quantitative findings by in depth interviews with 12 of 270 participants, their parents and significant others. The results indicated most participants expressed positive reactions on the items of two subscales: autonomy/self-determination and psychological well-being/life satisfaction. The means were 3.35 and 2.97 for the two subscales respectively. More than 95% of participants expected or strongly expected participants expected or strongly expected a stable job according to their responses on the autonomy/self determination subscale. However most of them felt less life satisfaction as compared to their desires for autonomy. The 12 participants demonstrated their desires for autonomy. The 12 participants demonstrated their independence on living arrangement, self-hygiene, vocational activities, community traveling, and leisure activities. Due to the lack of home environment modification, access to community participation and communication aids, several individuals needed assistances on their living activities including self-hygiene, meals preparation, shopping, social interaction and seeking for jobs that in term affect their life satisfaction. It revealed that the employment status, educational background and the disability category were significantly related to the degree of the autonomy/self determination, psychological well-being/life satisfaction, and overall quality of psychological life. In addition several factors were identified from in-depth interviewing 12 participants with physical disabilities and sensory impairment, including the severity of disability, the onset of disability, self acceptance of disability, belief system, family support, social support network, interest development, opportunity for choice, and environmental barriers. There were significant correlation between the scores of the QPLS and the scores on the scales of community, school, and vocational life quality with ranges from .23 to .82. Finally, several suggestions were proposed to promote the quality of psychological life on youth with physical disabilities and sensory impairment. |