中學體育教師專業發展評鑑之比較－－以美國、法國、臺灣為例

Comparison of Secondary School Physical Education Teacher Professional Development Evaluation-The Case of United States, France, and Taiwan

「教師專業發展評鑑」是展現教師專業素質與促進教師專業發展不可或缺的環節，觀諸歐美各國皆有一套教師專業發展評鑑的方式，而國內在最近幾年開始重視教師專業發展評鑑，基於此，本文針對美國、法國與臺灣中學體育教師評鑑制度進行比較分析，了解三國在評鑑流程、方式與指標之異同，提供國內實行體育教師評鑑之參酌，期能建構更適切、妥善、公平的評鑑制度，落實體育教師專業發展。研究方法採文件分析法進行比較。研究結果顯示三國在評鑑前、中、後流程的重點差異、多元資料蒐集之評鑑方式、以及評鑑指標皆注重教學能力的展現，經由比較探討後獲得主要啟示，供中學體育教師專業發展評鑑之參考。

Teacher evaluation is not only an integral part of teachers' professional development but also one of the indicators which is relevant to teachers' professional quality. The professional quality of teachers is emphasized in United Stated and Europe by setting teacher professional standards and benchmarks. Therefore, this paper aims to compare the middle school physical education teacher's evaluation criteria in United States, France, and Taiwan. By comparing the similarities and differences of the three countries, a better and fair PE teacher evaluation system could be build. Literature review and document analysis were used during the comparison process. The results showed that, 1. the key differences of the evaluation process among before, during and after period, 2. multiple data collection methods as evaluation tools, and 3. evaluation indicators are focused on teaching competency. Then, implications were extracted from the compared results. Finally, conclusion was addressed to the secondary PE teacher professional development evaluation.