英文摘要 |
Purpose: Inquiry-based teaching can improve the cognitive skills, learning motivation, and scientific achievements of students. However, few studies explore inquiry-based teaching's influence on gifted students, especially their scientific reasoning. Therefore, this study examines the effects of inquiry-based teaching on the development of scientific reasoning in gifted students from a junior high school. Methods: A gifted science class (28 gifted students) from a government school in central Taiwan was selected for this study. The first author who was also the science teacher for this class, applied NestInquiry teaching model (Tsai, Tuan & Chin, 2007) to this gifted science class from the first semester of eighth grade to the first semester of the ninth grade. Several topics from the science textbook were modified to fit the Nested-Inquiry teaching model: sound waves, distinguishing elements, reaction rates, acids, bases and salts, circular motion, work, and energy. The case teacher used inquiry-based teaching to help students familiarize themselves with science inquiry, conduct experiments, group discussion, data analysis, and communicate their findings. Nine gifted students were selected in this study to analyze their findings. There were various sources of data: classroom observation, videotaping of all the inquiry-based teaching, interviews of student groups after each inquirybased teaching, students' worksheets, students' reflections, and case teachers' lesson plans and reflection notes, videotaping of students' lab experiment skills test, and so on. We employed Halpern's (1996) argumentation criteria and Hogan and Fisherkeller's (1999) categories of scientific reasoning to analyze 9 students' data for the entire duration of the study period. Two researchers independently analyzed data and discussed their findings to reach a consensus (Erickson, 1986). Findings: This study revealed that the various types of students' reasoning (analytical, inferential, dialogical, evaluative, and integrative reasoning) gradually transformed during 3 stages of the study period. Students' reasoning patterns during inquiry activities possessed the following pattern during the first stage: analytic reasoning (47%), inferential reasoning (30%), and no reasoning (17%). Students' reasoning pattern during the second stage: no reasoning disappeared, analytic reasoning (43%), inferential reasoning (43%), and their dialogical reasoning (11%). Students' reasoning pattern during the third stage: analytic reasoning (32%), dialogical reasoning (22%), inferential reasoning (29%), evaluative reasoning (10%), and integrated reasoning (7%). Moreover, students also simultaneously displayed diverse reasoning forms. Dialogical reasoning was the underlying component that facilitated the competency of students' scientific reasoning. Conclusions/Implications: Investigating the impact of inquiry-based teaching on the development of scientific reasoning in gifted students from a junior high school was the purpose of this study. Findings indicate that long-term inquiry-based teaching can enhance gifted students' various reasoning performances. Dialogical reasoning can manifest during student-student interactions and teacher-student interactions. Students can develop higher-order reasoning abilities with dialogical reasoning. This study suggests that future science teachers implement longterm inquiry-based teaching to gifted classes to enhance the development of students' reasoning abilities. |