| 英文摘要 |
For years, entrance exams for private junior high schools in Taiwan have placed significant pressure on elementary students, drawing public concern. In November 2023, 15 private schools in Taichung agreed to abolish written exams, adopting a multi-admission system that evaluates academic performance, diverse achievements, and competition results. This study examines the National Student Art Competition, which has been held for over half a century. In recent years, awards from the competition have become a major advantage in private school admissions. However, practices such as analyzing judges’preferences, strategically selecting less competitive categories, and excessive adult intervention have increasingly deviated from the competition’s original educational purpose of cultivating artistic literacy and aesthetic appreciation. Using a qualitative approach, this research explores the current implementation of multi-admission policies in private schools and the shifting educational values and hidden curriculum embedded in art competitions under an exam-oriented context. In-depth interviews were conducted with two groups of parents from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Key findings include: (1) the multi-admission system has not reduced pressure but increased it due to expanded preparation demands; (2) most participating families expressed distrust toward public junior high schools, citing concerns about peer environments and teaching quality; and (3) over-involvement by parents and instructors has intensified unhealthy competition and distanced students from authentic artistic learning. |