董事解任事由之實證分析──兼論投保法裁判解任訴訟之修正建議

An Empirical Analysis of the Causes of Director Removals: Proposing Amendments to Judicial Removal Actions under Securities Investors and Futures Traders Protection Act

董事解任之原因包括：辭職、死亡、股東會決議解任、股東訴請法院解任與投保中心依投保法提起解任訴訟等。本文由公開資訊觀測站蒐集民國99年至113年間，上市與上櫃公司之董事解任事由，加以整理與分析，希望瞭解董事解任之主要原因。此外，透過實證資料之分析，印證現行法律運作之狀況，並發現法律適用之問題，最後再以實證資料之觀察與分析，對董事解任相關制度提供修正建議。由於投保中心依投保法訴請裁判解任之件數屬裁判解任之大宗，本文亦就該類型詳加分析，並以實證分析結果為基礎，對於投保法裁判解任制度提出修法建議。

The reasons for a director's removal include resignation, death, removal by a resolution of the shareholders' meeting, a shareholder's petition judicial removal, and a lawsuit brought by the Securities and & Futures Investors Protection Center (SFIPC) for judicial removal under the Securities Investor and Futures Trader Protection Act.
This article collects, organizes, and analyzes the reasons for the removals of directors of listed and OTC-listed companies from 2010 to 2024 based on data from the Market Observation Post System. The goal is to understand the main causes of director removals. Furthermore, by analyzing empirical data, this article aims to confirm the operational status of the current law, identify issues of its application, and propose amendments to the relevant systems for director removals based on the observations and analysis of the empirical data.
Given that most judicial removal cases are those filed by the SFIPC under the Investor Protection Act, this paper also provides a detailed analysis of this type of cases and proposes amendments to the judicial dismissal system in the Investor Protection Act based on the results of the empirical analysis.