分離或是集結？從布拉達蒂女性主義視角看法西斯式的語言規訓

Separation or Gathering? Viewing Fascist Linguistic Discipline Through Braidotti’s Feminist Perspective

布拉達蒂曾經指出，歐洲應在啟蒙思想的光輝遺留之外檢討法西斯與殖民主義的黑歷史。在當前的局勢之下，我們除了反思布拉達蒂對法西斯的批判，也應檢視法西斯式的治理技術以及父權傾向在話語、敘事與身份表述等層面的交涉與連結。在伊希加瑞的理論基礎之上，布拉達蒂肯認生命化成的思想潛力，對法西斯思想在不同場域所展現的治理技術提出質疑，同時強調主體能動性所具備的力量。然而面對社群力量突起、技術變革的當代，涉及語言變異與主體身份處境的多重角力持續，布拉達蒂關於主體的思想，如何重啟理論與實踐的對話？女性主義思想又如何持續對分子化的法西斯勢力提出可能的抵抗策略？從布拉達蒂的理論觀點出發，本文反思差異理論與女性主義的思想交纏，如何從語言的多重層次，對於法西斯式的語言遺留及其對當代治理技術的規訓展開批判；並探討女性主義在危機轉機、思辨與詭辯中突圍求存的思想處境，及其作為一種抵抗策略的可能性。

Rosi Braidotti has pointed out that Europe should reexamine the dark history of fascism and colonialism beyond the legacy of Enlightenment. In the current situation, we should also examine the intersections and connections of fascist and patriarchal tendencies in discourse, narrative, and expression of identities. Building upon Luce Irigaray’s theory, Braidotti questions fascism’s technical governance in different contexts by affirming the potential of becoming as well as emphasizing the power of subjectivity and agency. With the rising of community power and technological changes in contemporary society and the struggles involving linguistic variations and identitarian formations, how Braidotti’s thoughts on subjectivity may inspire the dialogue between theory and practice? How can feminist thoughts continue to inspire possible resistance strategies against divisive fascist forces? Drawing on Braidotti’s theoretical discourses, this article examines the fascist linguistic legacy and its disciplinary effects on contemporary governance across multiple levels of language. Furthermore, it explores the ideological predicament and survival strategies of feminism amidst crises, opportunities, speculation, and sophistry, as well as its potential as a mode of resistance.