中文摘要 |
本文旨在分析習近平政權「惠台政策」的特徵,並檢視透過該政策達到的影響力成效。惠台政策被視為「提供利益型」經濟謀略,以在中國境內設立支援台灣青年族群就業.創業的「海峽兩岸青年就業創業基地(創業基地)」政策為例,考察在該政策執行過程中,內在因素成為阻礙政策發揮有效影響力的可能性。從習政權將利益誘導舞台移至中國境內,得將透過惠台政策對台灣青年族群發揮影響力的舉措,視為中國境內利益誘導政治的延伸。本文除了將江澤民政權與胡錦濤政權的經驗與習政權實踐進行比較,也從侍從主義理論的觀點,分析習政權行使影響力的機制。研究發現創業基地相關支援政策,在實施過程中發生代理人問題。本文認為,該問題是阻礙中國對於台灣青年族群達到有效影響力的原因之一。 This article considers the effects of China’s economic statecraft, conducting a case study on the establishment of youth entrepreneurship bases, the concessionary policy intended to encourage and support young Taiwanese people to work and pursue their careers in mainland China, in China’s“Favor-Granting policies.”The Favor-Granting policies can be regarded as a particular type of economic statecraft, that intends to change the behavior and policies of another country by providing economic benefits. We examine the possibility that its precise effect will be limited by any problem inherent in the implementation process of the policies. This article adopts a clientelism approach to consider the effect of the youth entrepreneurship bases policy towards Taiwan’s youth in mainland China. This is because China’s influence, seen in‘Favor Granting’is viewed as pork barrel politics. We can know the effect of China’s influence by considering whether the clientelism will operate effectively. Comparing Xi Jinping’s practices with Jiang Zemin’s and Hu Jintao’s experiences, this article argues that a principal-agent problem caused by the pork barrel politics undermined the effect of the youth entrepreneurship bases policy towards Taiwan’s youth. |