從法律實例探討創作歷程之著作權爭議

Exploring Copyright Disputes in Artistic Creation from a Legal Practice Perspective

在資訊爆炸的數位時代下，訊息的傳送與接收無時不刻地進行著，這讓完全不帶他人影子的原創作品在孕育上日益困難，連帶使得藝術與設計的抄襲爭議愈趨頻繁，故如何透過法律素養，來避免創作行為的曝險形成，且維護己身作品的著作權益，成為一具探討價值之當代議題。因此本研究從法律實務案例進行實證探討，檢視在創作的不同歷程，即：累積醞釀、探索架構、實作發表等階段的著作權法爭點產生之所在。此外，為跳脫以法律為始的優位思考，本文另輔以大專院校創作與設計教學之專家訪談，透過其對於判例結果的觀點比較，得就法律實務與藝術設計的跨域面向來省思著作權之合理接觸、實質相似、原創性爭議，繼而提出公共財使用、或創作過程紀錄等創作行為之防禦因應，並進一步就課程養成規劃加以建議。相關成果除有助於藝術與設計教育在多面向思維的價值拓展，亦可作為政策立法之參考應用。

Creating a complete original artwork is not an easy task nowadays in the digital age of knowledge explosion where message is conveyed and received every moment, resulting that plagiarism has become a common issue of copyright. In order to protect the rights and benefits of artworks and avoid the risks during the creation processes of preparation, exploration, and publication, this paper conducted an empirical study through law cases accompanying with interview surveys of university educators in artistic creation, commercial design, and creative industries. Through comparison of art education perspectives, this paper further explores the copyright issues, such as access, substantial similarity, and originality of artworks from the cross-disciplinary perspective of legal practice, and then provide the defensive suggestions, for example, public domain and process recording of artistic creation for educators in the planning of art and design related programs, expanding the value of art education in multi-faceted thinking, as well as reference of policy and legislation.