功能主義刑法解釋論“問題性思考”命題檢討

Review of Proposition of ''Problematic Thinking'' in Functionalist Theory of Criminal Law Interpretation

中國語境下的功能主義刑法解釋論應當認真對待和深刻檢討“問題性思考”這一法哲學基礎命題，從偏重結果的功能主義轉向結果與方法並重的、整體有效性的功能主義，從法官决策行動論轉向法官决策有效論，堅定主張並深刻論證刑法解釋方法確證功能體系化命題，努力追求並真正實現刑法解釋結論合法性、合理性和合目的性“三性統一體”有效性。當前應進一步完善具有中國特色的案例指導制度，從微觀上具體展開中國本土化的問題性思考，切實解决機械司法問題，並以此作為當下我國功能主義刑法解釋論的重要創新點。

The criminal law interpretation theory on the functionalism in Chinese context should take the basic proposition of legal philosophy seriously, that is, ''problematic thinking''. In addition, lay equal stress on the results and methods, and focus on the overall effectiveness instead of the result-oriented functionalism. The judge's decision-making supposed to be more intersubjective rather than autarchic. Furthermore, deepen the studying on the function of criminal law interpretation method to confirm its systematism, so as to truly realize the trinity of legality, reasonability, and purposiveness of interpretation conclusion. At present, the case guidance system with Chinese characteristics should be further improved, the issues of Chinese localization should be developed at a micro level, and the mechanical judicial process should be solved effectively. These are the critical points and innovations of improving the criminal law interpretation on the functionalism in Chinese context.