私法制度中的代數算法黑箱及其應對

Black Box of Algebraic Algorithms in Private Law System and Its Response

因私法制度中代數算法規範（代數規範）的缺陷，一些指導性案例未能給出判决的明確算法，私法制度中的代數算法黑箱導致了判决書中的算法瑕疵。傳統私法制度深受古希臘幾何學的影響，因而疏離了代數算法且輕視相應的代數規範，人工智能中機器算法的繁榮無助於緩解私法中的代數算法黑箱，反而將新的算法黑箱疊加於傳統黑箱之上。代數規範是私法制度中規定定量計算的法律規範，它是私法規範中的定量維度和必不可少的組成部分，且隨著代數算法在認識論中的地位上升而日益重要。私法制度應當改變疏離代數算法的傳統，完善其代數規範，適用代數規範作為判决的依據，並結合定性規範以指導與檢驗法律人工智能，以限縮判决書中的算法瑕疵。

Due to defects of algebraic algorithm provisions (algebraic provisions) in the private law system, some directive cases fail to provide clear algorithms of the judgments, that is, black boxes of algebraic algorithm in the private law system lead to algorithm defects in the judgments. Traditional private law is deeply influenced by ancient Greek geometry, so it alienates the algebraic algorithm and ignores the corresponding algebraic provisions. The prosperity of machine algorithm in legal artificial intelligence does not alleviate black boxes of algebraic algorithm in private law, but overlays the new algorithm black box on the traditional black box. Algebraic provisions are the legal norms specified algebraic computation in private law system, which are the quantitative dimensions and an indispensable part of private law system, and they become more and more important with the rise of algorithm in epistemology. Private law system should change the tradition of alienation of algebraic algorithm, improve its algebraic provisions, apply them as the basis for civil judgments, and combine geometric provisions to guide and test legal artificial intelligence, so as to limit algorithm defects in the judgments.