英文摘要 |
The modest and restrained principle of anti- monopoly law enforcement refers to the necessary, moderate, restrained and non- aggressive attitude in the general law enforcement view and the path method. The ideal state of anti- monopoly law enforcement is impartial, appropriate and precise positioning. However, the ideal goal could not reach utterly but only could be as close as possible. Thus, it can only settle for less-than-ideal alternative on general enforcement effects. Due to the difficulty of understanding and the strong self-healing ability of the market, in the pursuit of less-than-ideal alternative, we could adopt the modest and restrained principle of law enforcement that 'rather let off than treat unjustly' to minimize the cost of errors. Anti-monopoly law is a combination of economy and law. It often takes economic analysis as its essence and legal method as its manifestation. Its modest and restrained principle needs to be implemented in methodology. The antimonopoly law has both rigidity and flexibility. The legal method with legal interpretation as the core is the path and carrier to reconcile rigidity and flexibility. The modest and restrained interpretation could realize the combination of rigidity and flexibility.' Economic analysis is an important support for the implementation of the anti-monopoly law, but it still has its limitations. Since law enforcement involves 'life or death' after all, economic analysis should be used cautiously and appropriately. In the early stage of the implementation of the anti-monopoly law, it is especially necessary to prevent 'fetishism' of economic analysis. |