陽明文庫本《源氏物語》帚木卷中源氏的人物形象－－書寫者的立場與其影響－－

The Character of Genji in Hahakigi Volume of the Yōmei Bunko Text: The Standpoint of the Writer and the Effect

陽明文庫本《源氏物語》內有許多卷是鎌倉時代書寫，且因內含與古注釋《源氏釋》引用內容相同的本文，因此受到重視。關於本寫本的研究，不僅止於概略性的書誌情報介紹，還有許多以其文本內容為研究對象的論著。然而，雖然首卷桐壺卷有許多相關論文，在那之後的帚木卷雖同樣是鎌倉時代所書寫，卻未見有針對其文本性質全面考察的論著。有鑑於此，本論文為得知鎌倉時代的《源氏物語》是何樣貌，選擇以帚木卷為考察對象。結果發現，雖然如《陽明叢書國書篇》的簡介中所說，有不太貼切的字句表現，但進一步深究後可發現，陽明文庫本中有數處異文皆可看出比其他寫本更講究明確表現的書寫態度。陽明文庫本帚木卷的異文不僅止於此，還有會對主角源氏的人物形象造成影響者。為釐清其原因，論者進一步嘗試探討其他異文後發覺，帚木卷內存在與桐壺卷相同的校訂方針，且有可能站在空蟬乃至於其他女性登場人物的立場書寫物語。迄今，在研究源氏物語峙，書寫者的性別並未被特別提出探討，但有鑑於本篇論文中考察的諸例異文所顯現的傾向，有關此課題的探討應值得今後持續深化。

There are many volumes written in Kamakura period can be found in Youmeibunkobon and many pieces of text are similar to Genjisyaku. Therefore, the text is important. However, even though there are some papers about the Kiritubo volume, it is hard to find out one for the Hahakigi volume. In order to discover the features of the text written in Kamakura period, this essay choose the Hahakigi volume as the object. As a result, though there are some incorrect pieces of text, an aim for rather definite text can be found in several passages. Furthermore, there are some phrases influence the character of Genji. Therefore, the author of this essay tried to analyze the differences and found that the same principle can be recognized both in the Kiritubo and the Hahakigi volume. Besides, the writer of this text sympathized the woman of the story while writing. Hitherto, the gender of the writer has not been emphasized. However, in view of the situation, it is necessary to consider this issue.