法典化與法體系的內部構成

伴隨著《民法典》通過，中國正在醞釀一場幾乎涉及所有部門法的法典化運動，它們基本上遵循民法典的“法典＝體系性＋法律總則”的模式，並認為自己在體系性與法律總則兩個方面並無困難。但如果仔細思考民法典的法典化理論，“法典=體系性+法律總則”的基本模式只是法典化的結果，而非該理論本身。如果注意到法典化與部門法劃分之間的必然聯繫，並且法典化的最終根據在於“特定部門法具備價值上的完備性”，那麼就只有部分的部門法才有法典化的可能；或者說，並非所有的部門法都能夠被法典化。

With the enactment of the PRC Civil Code, China is brewing a codification movement involving almost all sectors of law, which basically follow the formula of “codification= the systematic nature of law + general parts of law”borrowed from the Civil Code. Moreover, it is generally believed that all sectors of law have no difficulty in following the formula. However, if we carefully consider the general theory of codification, the formula is only the result of that theory, rather than the theory itself. If we pay attention to the inevitable relationship between codification and division of laws, and to the fact that the ultimate basis of codification is that“specific sector of laws or special law have possessed the value completeness”, then only can those laws be codified. In other words, not all laws can be codified.