英文摘要 |
The reasons for the underestimation of the occupational disease detection rate in Taiwan may be due to the failure of occupational injury and disease prevention inspections, difficulty in clarifying the causal relationship of occupational diseases, incompleteness of labor working environment exposure database and biodetection database, and lack of labor and work information, and so forth. Reviewing the research tools of occupational epidemiology in Taiwan relies on cross-sectional questionnaire surveys which cannot be used for disease causality analysis due to the long-term accumulation of occupational diseases. Therefore, this study believes that the analysis of big database may be the only way to solve the problem. This study lists the epidemiological methods commonly used in occupational epidemiology to assess the relationship between occupational diseases and occupational exposure, and the advantages and limitations of each research design method; in addition, this study lists various constructed big database from many ministries and variables related to occupational diseases and exposures. Through integrating and connecting each database, it more accurately describes the relationship between occupational diseases and exposure factors. This research also puts forward several challenges and suggestions for the current labor insurance database: 1.The labor insurance database lacks occupation variable. 2.The accuracy of labor insurance data needs to be strengthened. 3.The occupational-related diseases announced by the Ministry of Labor and the codes of the International Disease Classification cannot correspond to each other. 4.It can quickly set up a response team to face emergencies and hold regular expert meetings and closely discuss potentially high-risk occupational-related diseases. 5.The health awareness of workers should be strengthened. 6.Expand the population of health checkups, and establish monitoring and tracking of post-employment health checkups. |