我國大學校務自我評鑑執行現況之探析

An Analysis on the Implementation of the Self-evaluation of Institutional review in Taiwan

大學進行自我評鑑已然是世界各國的最新的發展動向之一，藉由授與大學更多自我空間與自治能力，有可能提升內部自主、自治與管理能力，並且推動大學的品質提升。有鑑於此，教育部逐步推動自我評鑑制度，而現在執行校務評鑑時，也必須有自我評鑑的機制。但是國內並沒有文獻關注本項機制的推動、落實，以及成效議題。本研究立基於此，選擇4所綜合型大學，以文件分析與焦點座談的方式，瞭解大學在依據校務評鑑的整體架構下，實際如何執行自我評鑑，以及內部人員如何知覺現有制度，有哪些益處與效果。研究有以下六項發現：一、研究對象缺乏系統性的自我評鑑規劃，自行研發評鑑項目指標之能力較欠缺；二、研究對象自我評鑑組織設計完整，專責單位扮演溝通聯繫角色三、自我評鑑之評鑑委員遴聘與培訓機制仍待提升；四、執行程序完備，惟資料蒐集與意見統整尚待加強；五、後續追蹤考核機制完善且能具體落實；六、校務評鑑結果缺乏連結，實質成效仍有疑慮。

"It has been a new development of carrying out internal self-evaluation within the university across the countries. By granting more autonomy and empowering governance capacity, the government expects to raise university’s internal self-governance and management and the enhancement of quality. It is against this wider context, Ministry of Education aims to promote the system of self-evaluation since 2012 and the current university institutional evaluation is also underpinned by self-evaluation. However, there is no literature addressing the promotion, implementation and outcome of this system. Based on this rationale, this study choosing four comprehensive universities as case studies attempts to explore the current implementation situation and issues of self-evaluation. The methods employed for data collection include document analysis and focus group interview. Our research findings indicate that universities lack a systematic self-evaluation plan, and their abilities to develop evaluation standards and indicators on their own is relatively inadequate. The self-evaluation organization in university is well designed, and the dedicated unit plays a role in communication. Self-evaluation reviewers’ selection, recruitment and training mechanism still needs to be improved; The implementation procedures are well-established, but data collection and opinions integration need to be strengthened; The follow-up assessment mechanism is good enough and can be implemented in detail; The institutional evaluation result is lacking connection of government policies, the real impact is still in doubt."