| 中文摘要 |
"本案之爭點在於1946年商標法（藍亨法）是否准許以單一顏色註冊作為商標。本院認為有時顏色符合一般合法商標要件。而且，當顏色符合一般合法商標要件時，沒有特殊法律規定禁止以單一顏色作為商標。The question in this case is whether the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act), permits the registration of a trademark that consists, purely and simply, of a color. We conclude that, sometimes, a color will meet ordinary legal trademark requirements. And, when it does so, no special legal rule prevents color alone from serving as a trademark." |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
