| 中文摘要 |
"協同意見: POWELL大法官，BRENNAN大法官﹙部分﹚，STEVENS大法官﹙部分﹚。此一協同意見由POWELL大法官執筆。本席贊同本院之判決以及多數決意見。然而，本席會更強調小學和中學的特殊性，此特殊性使得學校沒有必要提供學生相同於成人和青少年在非校園場所受到的憲法保護。CONCUR BY: POWELL; BLACKMUN; BRENNAN (In Part); STEVENS (In Part) I agree with the Court's decision, and generally with its opinion. I would place greater emphasis, however, on the special characteristics of elementary and secondary schools that make it unnecessary to afford students the same constitutional protections granted adults and juveniles in a nonschool setting." |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
