訂古當前傲世姿：論衛聚賢、孫次舟辨史疑古之話語權競奪

Arrogance of Academic Achievement: On Wei Ju Xian and Sun Ci Zhou Competition on Discussing History and Skepticism of Antiquity for Discourse Rights

衛聚賢、孫次舟分別為1920年代清華國學研究院及北大國文系畢業學生，在民初歷史及考古結合的學術趨向中，兩人曾互相在對方主編之學術刊物發表文章。尤其在「疑古」思潮之下，衛、孫二人頗多奇說怪論引起當時學人側目，然迄今對二人論學及相關言說之研究仍未多見。究竟什麼樣的個人心理與學術氛圍促成了他們的治學趨向？他們的言說內容為何？二人為何要衝撞當時的知識場域？如何的挑戰其他學人的文化民族主義情懷？本文希冀透過相關報刊文獻及史料之抉發，討論二人相關話語內容及反映出的學術性格，辨析衛、孫被時人視為異端的論說，在民初知識話語競奪當中所能呈現之思想史意義。

Wei Ju Xian (1898-1990) graduated from the Tsinghua Academy of Chinese Learning, and Sun Ci Zhou (?-2000) graduated from the Department of Chinese Literature at Peking University in the 1920s. In the academic trend of combining history and archaeology in the early 20th century, they published articles in journals edited by each other. Their bizarre theories were contempt by scholars during the ideological trend of ''skepticism of antiquity'' time, so there has been little research on their theories and discourses. What individual psychology and academic atmosphere contributed to their academic tendency? What were their contents on discourses, and why did they collide with the field of knowledge at the time? How to challenge the cultural nationalism of other scholars? Therefore, this paper aims to discuss the discourse content and literary character of Wei and Sun via relevant publications and historical materials, and to analyze the significance of their theories that they regarded as heresies in the contest of intellectual discourse in the early Republic of China.