中文摘要 |
"本論文以語意及句法的觀點分析日語中「七」名詞並列詞組的結構,並探討並列連詞「E」重複形的句法特徵。「」重複形在益,田達(2006),Fukui and Sakai(2003),Vermeulen(2008)等文獻中認為為單純的複製,在句法上不具有實質的功能。對此Asada(2014)則主張該重複的「E」為焦點標誌,透過焦點的語意來解釋句子的文法性。本文先從「E」名詞並列詞組在句子中所觀察到歧義性出發討論該歧義與範域解釋(Scope)的關聯性,同時主張不同的範域解釋是透過句法操作而衍生出來。再者,本文亦透過方·广交替、分裂句,片段語答句,名詞省略等句法現象討論「七」重複形在句中所扮演的角色,並統一說明「E」重複形的句法特徵。 This study focuses on NP coordinated structures headed by To in Japanese and attempts to clarify the syntactic characteristics of the repetitive coordinator ''To' (simply called RC-To). RC-To has been considered as a phonologically optional element in most literatures (Fukui and Sakai 2003, Masuoka and Takubo 2006, Vermeulen 2008). However, Aasada (2014) analyzes it as a focus particle implicating exhaustive specification. In this study, we start with ambiguous sentences and show that the ambiguity can be captured by scope, which is related to syntactic structure. RC-To seems to play a significant role in terms of syntactic movement in Ga/No conversion, (pseudo-)cleft constructions, fragment answers and NP ellipsis, and hence should be given a unified account." |
英文摘要 |
本論文以語意及句法的觀點分析日語中「七」名詞並列詞組的結構,並探討並列連詞「E」重複形的句法特徵。「」重複形在益,田達(2006),Fukui and Sakai(2003),Vermeulen(2008)等文獻中認為為單純的複製,在句法上不具有實質的功能。對此Asada(2014)則主張該重複的「E」為焦點標誌,透過焦點的語意來解釋句子的文法性。本文先從「E」名詞並列詞組在句子中所觀察到歧義性出發討論該歧義與範域解釋(Scope)的關聯性,同時主張不同的範域解釋是透過句法操作而衍生出來。再者,本文亦透過方·广交替、分裂句,片段語答句,名詞省略等句法現象討論「七」重複形在句中所扮演的角色,並統一說明「E」重複形的句法特徵。 This study focuses on NP coordinated structures headed by To in Japanese and attempts to clarify the syntactic characteristics of the repetitive coordinator ''To' (simply called RC-To). RC-To has been considered as a phonologically optional element in most literatures (Fukui and Sakai 2003, Masuoka and Takubo 2006, Vermeulen 2008). However, Aasada (2014) analyzes it as a focus particle implicating exhaustive specification. In this study, we start with ambiguous sentences and show that the ambiguity can be captured by scope, which is related to syntactic structure. RC-To seems to play a significant role in terms of syntactic movement in Ga/No conversion, (pseudo-)cleft constructions, fragment answers and NP ellipsis, and hence should be given a unified account. |