英文摘要 |
By taking the names of civil organizations which identify groups as the medium, this paper aims to reveal that the political control of naming rights has been out of the “public” sphere and further into the “private” sphere. The historical literature analysis is adopted to probe into the root of disputes over the naming of civil organizations by surveying the historical evolution of the related laws and regulations. Especially focused on the struggle of national symbols which arise from the names of national civil organizations which are prefixed the names of administrative region. This study reveals that the government, by enacting the relevant laws and regulations, requires that civil organizations organize and even grade according to the administrative regions, prefix the names of administrative regions to civil organizations, and prefix Republic of China to national organizations to carry out the dual governance with “Rule the People by the Land” and “Rule the Land by the People”. The name of the district, which is named after political intervention, is represented to influence the identity and affection of the civil organizations. The naming of national occupational organizations has long been forced to prefix the words “Republic of China”, showing the different national identity from the other-People's Republic of China. The names of the national social organizations were originally required to prefix “China”, “Chinese” or “Republic of China” showed the government still continued to use the old political and national symbols to force the Taiwanese to “Regard Country as Home” after the R. O. C. regime exiled to Taiwan. Since 1999, the “legitimate” use of the word “Taiwan” has marked the Taiwanese localized practice of the “Regard Home as Country”. The bottom-up forces have been creating new and competitive national symbols, together with other forces pushing the turn of Taiwanese national identity. |