資訊隱私權的憲法時刻

資訊隱私權的傳統規範基礎以個人為本位，以私人和公共為二分法，圍繞空間、事物與主體維度，形成五種理論解釋和六項概念核心。隱私的洛克範式與康德範式，晚近以來匯流為控制范式，成為當代資訊隱私保護的核心原則。智慧社會，特別是大資料技術，瓦解了控制範式的技術假設，進而對資訊隱私權的規範基礎形成全面衝擊和挑戰。技術巨變重構了社會圖景，在空間、時間與社會維度引發隱私保護的深刻困境。需要從資訊理論和社會理論視角重新理解隱私，重構資訊隱私權的規範基礎：從個人本位轉向社會本位；從控制范式轉向信任範式；從獨佔維度轉向溝通維度；從二元對峙轉向一體多元；從權利視角轉向權力視角；從概念獨斷轉向語用商談。在憲法時刻的時間意識下，為我國資訊隱私法的未來發展尋找新的體系框架。

The traditional normative foundation of the right to information privacy is based on individualism, taking private and public as the dichotomy, centering on the dimensions of space, things, and subjects, forming five theoretical explanations and six conceptual cores. The Lockian paradigm and Kantian paradigm of privacy have recently converged into the control paradigm, which has become the core principle of contemporary information privacy protection. The intelligent society, especially the big data technology, dismantles the control paradigm’s technical assumptions, forming a comprehensive impact, and challenging the normative foundation of information privacy. Technological developments have reconstructed the social landscape, causing aprofound dilemma of privacy protection in the dimensions of space, time, and society. It is necessary to re-conceptualize privacy from the perspectives of information theory as well as social theory, and to reconstruct the normative basis of information privacy rights: from individual to social standards; from control paradigm to trust paradigm; from monopoly to communication; from dual confrontation to unity and pluralism; from the perspective of rights to the standpoint of power; from conceptual arbitrariness to pragmatic negotiation. Finally, under the constitutional moment’s imminence, this article discusses a new system framework for the future development of China’s information privacy law.