“複規範性”從何談起

如何面對法律全球化的知識挑戰，已成為全世界所有法律人的知識共業。法律全球化不僅迫使我們發現本國法律的局限，更展現出一個更大尺度的法律交流的真實圖景，一個急需被認真對待、被細緻描述、被再規範化以重構法學範式的知識前提。“複規範性”的認知性概念的提出，試圖克服歐洲中心主義的法學範式，促進跨區域、跨文化、跨學科的對話與知識生產。法律全球化對法律實務、法學教育與法學研究的深刻影響，這是提出“複規範性”的現實語境；“法律多元主義”概念的使用缺陷，那正是“複規範性”所試圖超越的認知語境；討論“複規範性”概念本身，如何作為法律史學的研究工具，如何從人類行為學角度進行跨文化觀察與對話，這種對話正是全球化時代重構法學範式的知識前提。

Today, how to respond to the intellectual challenges of legal globalization has become the common issue to legal scholars around the world. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the process of transnationalization of law and highlight the significant concept of multinormativity in order to promote the increasingly interdisciplinary and transnational dialogue on law. In this paper, I attempt to demonstrate the profound influence of legal globalization on legal practice, education and research as the background, reflect critically on the flaws in application of legal pluralism, and reveal the epistemic potential of multinormativity in building aglobal legal history from the perspective of praxeology.