構建智慧財產權大司法體制

智慧財產權司法體制包括智慧財產權司法組織和審判機制兩個部分。我國智慧財產權司法體制改革在智慧財產權專門法院建設中進行，旨在建立專門的智慧財產權司法體系。這一體系構造，包括以下五個方面：（1）在全國範圍內設立的智慧財產權專門法院既是初審，也是上訴審，是“初審＋上訴審”的模式，同時還要組建國家層級的智慧財產權高級法院或者最高法院智慧財產權巡迴法庭；（2）智慧財產權法院建設不能遍地開花式地進行，應該以中心城市為基礎組建10至13家，輔之以派出法庭的模式；（3）智慧財產權法院實行民事、行政、刑事審判“三合一”審判組織模式；（4）破除大陸法系行政職權主義的固有思維，司法有權對智慧財產權的有效性與否作出實質性的裁判；（5）設立技術調查官，配合專家諮詢、專家陪審及司法鑒定等制度，形成技術類案件的技術事實多元查明機制。循此思路形成的智慧財產權大司法體制，強化了智慧財產權審判的專門化和專業性，是符合創新型國家建設的制度優化方案，足以樹立起我國智慧財產權司法之“強保護”的國際形象。

Intellectual property(IP)judicial system comprises two parts: IP judicial structure and IP trial mechanism. China’s IP judicial system reform should be carried on along with the establishment of IP special courts aiming to a judicial system specific to IP. Such a system contains five elements. First, the nation-wide IP special court is both a first trial court and an appellate court, and another state-level IP High Court or IP Circuit Courts of the Supreme Court should be set up. Secondly, IP courts should not be too spread out, but should be set up in 10-13 central cities, supplemented with branch courts. Thirdly, the trial mechanism in IP courts will be''3-in-1'', that is civil, administrative and criminal trials in one court. Fourthly, the manner of reasoning inherited from administrative authority principle of civil law system should be avoided, and the judicial court should have the authority of substantively judging the validity or invalidity of IP. Finally, apluralistic mechanism for technical finding in technical cases should be established by setting up a system of technical investigators, co-operating with expert consulting mechanism, expert assessor system and judicial appraisal system. Thus an overarching judicial system will be formed, IP trial will be specialized and the specialness thereof will be strengthened. Such ajudicial system is an optimized choice conforming to the construction of an innovative country, and is sufficient to present to the world a picture of ''strong judicial protection'' of IP in China.