英文摘要 |
Taiwan’s factional politics has rarely been a core topic for political research. The past literature regarding the development of Taiwan’s local factions almost always embedded in other research topics such as rule of authoritarian regime, social network, organization mobilization, political democratic transformation, operation and competition between parties, and etc. Based on the existing research, we may identify two theories to explain Taiwan’s factional politics—namely, the patron-client theory and the social network theory. This study is to classify and review the two theories. In short, the purpose of this study is twofold: first, it analyzes the differences between the two theories. Second, it examines the extent to which the two theories are still upheld in Taiwan after democratization and two times of party alternation. The patron-client theory argues that the main goal for factions is to maximize economic profits and the formation of factions is based on a top-down process. This kind of longitudinal relationship has been added some uncertainties because factions cannot find a steady agent in the current multi-party system. On the other hand, the social network theory argues that the formation of factions is from the bottom to top, under which the network needs to be constructed and maintained by itself. It may lead to the multifactorial and open-minded leadership model after democratization, and may add uncertain factors to the lateral relationship. Therefore, the double uncertainties environment prompts local factions to be heterogeneous and differentiates the modes of local politics. To fully understand the performance and behavior patterns, this study conclude that the future research needs to construct a new theory that can explain how the local faction act after the democratic transition and figure out how local factions adapt to the uncertainties, keep operating, gain profits, and survive in the democratic institution. |