從文章脈絡探討引用發言之注釋

A Study of Comments on Quoted Statements Based on Context

所謂發言的引用是指，引用者在某場面重新呈現其他場面的發言。此時，引用者經常根據不同的文章脈絡來加入注釋。本研究著眼於引用者所依據之文章脈絡，針對其種類、出現方式的多樣性，以及注釋的可信度、功過、本質等評價問題做分析探討。結果得知如下：a. 引用者的注釋是根據言語的、非言語的、心情的三種文章脈絡。b. 依言語的、非言語的、心情的文章脈絡之順序，檢驗注釋是否得宜之困難度逐漸提升。但這不等於注釋的可信度。c. 注釋除依據之文章脈絡外，於品詞、位置、並用等也呈現多樣性。d. 新聞文章因注釋而成立，同時也有過度反映引用者主觀之危險性。e. 注釋的本質可說是「掩飾在客觀性描寫下的主觀性解說」。

Quoting a statement is a quoter re-presents a statement from another situation. When doing so, the quoter may add his comments based the context. This study focused on the context of the quotation and performed analyses regarding the credibility of comment, merits and demerits, essence, and other evaluation issues. The results are summarized below. a. Quoters usually quote statements based on three types of context, linguistic context, non-linguistic context, and emotional context. b. The types of context sorted in ascending order by their degrees of difficulty to verify whether a comment is appropriate were: linguistic context, non-linguistic context, and emotional context. But this difficulty does not equal to comment credibility. c. Besides the types of context, there are also various parts of speech, places, and combinations of comments. d. An article established based on a comment may be at risk of over reflecting the quoter’s subjective views. e. The essence of comments is ''subjective interpretation covered by objective description''.