志賀直哉 「焚火」論一以複數形人務 「皆」為視點

The Research about ''Takibi'' by Shiga Naoya; Focus on the Plural form ''Minna''

志賀直哉中期作品「焚火」由於在作品中「皆」這個複數形人稱被使用高達14次之多，一直以來「皆」這個複數形人稱被視為解讀本作品的一大關鍵，廣為討論。然而「皆」這個複數形人稱並非只出現於「焚火」這個作品，由初期作品至後期作品皆可看到「皆」這個複數形人稱的使用用例。本論文目的在於透過志賀文學「皆」的問題體系的角度，重新檢討「焚火」中「皆」這個複數形人稱所代表的涵意;並進一步重新定位「焚火」這部作品。考察結果得知:在初期作品「大津順吉」中複數形人稱象微「感情連帶」而這種「感情連帶」不同於「家族」「血緣」情誼，而是由「夥伴」關條所組成的連帶情誼。而在「焚火」中則是描述出這樣的「感情連帶」是與血緣關像的情誼相近，這也正是此作品的特性。「焚火」中的這種轉變，不難想像是和實際生活中志賀與父親關條的轉化有極大關像。也就是說:早期由於實際生活中與家人的對立，因此志賀在作品中描述出脫離「血緣」追求與「夥伴」所組成的「威情連帶」。然而隨著大正六年與父親的和解，轉而追求與血緣情誼相近的「感情綜上所述「焚火」這部作品不單只是大量使用「皆」這個複數形人稱，最重要的是它呈現出作者在「皆」等複數形人稱問題體條上所達到的新境界。

About ”Takibi” (1920), because the plural form ”minna” is used massively in the work, therefore the majority researchers thought this plural form ”minna” is a big key point to understood this work, discusses widely. Nevertheless, ”minna” the plural form asserts that not only appeared in ”Takibi”, from early works to later works can be seen the use case of this word. This thesis aims Shiga literature ”minna” issue systems point of view, review ”minna” meaning of the plural form asserts that represent and further relocating ”Takibi”. Investigate the result is: In early work ”Otsu Junkichi” (1912) the plural form means ”emotional solidarity”. This kind of ”emotional solidarity” is different from 'the family', 'blood relationship', but similar to the partner's relation. However, in ”Takibi” this kind of ”emotional solidarity” is similar to blood relationship. This is a characteristic of this works too.According to the argumentation above, ”Takibi” not only use the plural form in a large amount, the most important thing is it demonstrates the new realm that the author reaches on this question system.