從「言行錄」到「正史」：試論《伊洛淵源錄》與《宋史‧道學傳》對學術史建構的歧異

The Differences between the Academic Histories Constructed by Yi Luo Yuan Yuan Lu and Song Shi Dao Xue Zhuan

自清朝以來學者往往認為《宋史‧道學傳》與《伊洛淵源錄》的關係非常密切。然而，在這樣的觀點之上，其實還可以更深入的探討，尤其是兩者之間所建構的學術史視野有何歧異。因此，本篇論文嘗試對此議題進行探討與分析。首先，考察兩者有密切關係的說法及出處，並嘗試提出作為「言行錄」的《伊洛淵源錄》，與作為「正史」的〈道學傳〉，前者實際上是扮演著為後者預備史料的功能，而後者則是將前者理學群體獨立於其他學術群體的觀念，具體呈現出來。其次，再藉由下列四個對照標準：「設立精神與原則」、「程門學脈的處理方式」、「北宋四子及邵雍的處理順序」、「傳記史料的處理差異」，釐清兩者所建構的學術史視野有何歧異。

The purposes of this paper are twofold. Firstly, it seeks to investigate the relationship between Yi Luo Yuan Yuan Lu (The Sources and Origins of the Rivers Yi and Luo) and Song Shi Dao Xue Zhuan (the chapters on Neo-Confucianism in The History of the Song Dynasty). Secondly, this paper attempts to examine the differences between the academic histories constructed by the two bodies. To achieve the first purpose, it has to review the discourses that held a close relationship between the two bodies and identifies their origins carefully. To fulfill the second purpose, it applies a set of four criteria for comparing the different trajectories of academic history charted by two bodies.