劉毓崧《尚書舊疏考正》析評

Analysis of Liu Yusong's Investigation of Old Explanatory Notes in the Shangshu

唐代《五經正義》之編纂乃在六朝義疏基礎上修訂而成，遂遺留許多新、舊疏摻雜的現象。清代劉文淇、劉毓崧父子始專門以此為題，考證《五經正義》舊疏的判別。此文選擇劉毓崧《尚書舊疏考正》一書，歸納其考證方法共為四大項，並與劉文淇的考證方法進行比較。此文另對於劉毓崧相關條例提出商榷之說：認為劉氏以墨守「疏不破注」作為孔穎達編修原則可再討論，並指出劉毓崧忽略《五經正義》在唐代經過三次編修的情形，以及其他考證方法皆有可待商榷之處，因此連帶影響到考證方法的周全性。

The compilation of The Rectified Interpretation of the Five Classics in the Tang Dynasty was revised on the basis of these explanatory notes of the Six Dynasties, thus many new and old notes remained in The Rectified Interpretation of the Five Classics. Liu Wenqi and Liu Yusong of the Qing Dynasty started to specially differentiate the new and old explanatory notes of this rectified interpretation. This article chooses Investigation of Old Explanatory Notes in Shangshu, that was written by Liu Yusong, to generalize its method of textual criticism, which includes four main areas. In this study, I argue that Liu regarded “Note and Commentary not Annotation＂ as the revising principle of Kong Yingda is not realistic, and points out that Liu Yusong ignores the fact that The Rectified Interpretation of the Five Classics had been revised twice in the Tang Dynasty thus influencing the completeness of the textual criticism.