中文晤談評量問卷內部結構及信效度之探究：諮商心理師層次分析

A Study of Internal Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Session Evaluation Questionnaire(C-SEQ): Counselor-level Analyses

晤談評量問卷（Session Evaluation Questionnaire，SEQ）過去經常被作為評量諮商影響的用途，最新版SEQ-5係由21題語意區分的相對形容詞組成，各題項採7點評量的方式計分。本研究探討心理師在中文第五版晤談評量問卷（Chinese Session Evaluation Questionnaire，C-SEQ）的內部結構，以2017年4月至2017年7月間，在台灣34所大學諮商輔導中心的諮商心理師N＝187為參與者，以每位參與者最近一次接案後所填答的一份C-SEQ，共計187份，探討諮商心理師在C-SEQ的因素結構、C-SEQ的內部相關和內部一致性。研究結果：以C-SEQ晤談評量向度和晤談後情感評量向度各10題，進行探索性因素分析，結果顯示C-SEQ在晤談評量向度，和在晤談後情感向度分別包含：深度性、順暢性，以及正向性和覺醒性四個因素的結構，C-SEQ在深度性、順暢性和正向性間存有低度到中度的相關（r＝.22－.63，p＜.01），以及C-SEQ四個因素具有中高度的內部一致性信度（α＝.50－.87），整體問卷具有高度的一致性信度（α＝.86）。諮商心理師層次的C-SEQ可作為諮商歷程實務和諮商研究之用途。 The Session Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) has been applied to measure the impact of counseling sessions. The SEQ Form 5 (the most recent version) has a semantic differential format, consisting of 21 bipolar adjective scale (1 to 7). The items are divided into two sections: session evaluation and postsession mood evaluation. The stem 'This session was' precedes the first 11 items (session evaluation). The stem 'Right now I feel' precedes the second 10 items (postsession mood evaluation). The purpose of this research attempts to explore the internal structure of the Chinese Session Evaluation (C-SEQ) of counselor level. The C-SEQ data were collected in a convenience sample of 187 participants at 34 universities in Taiwan, with each participant completed one copy of C-SEQ over the course of her/his latest individual counseling, and data collecting were from April, 2017 to July, 2017. The findings of this study indicated that the counselors showed actual responses toward the C-SEQ. The results of this study suggested that four factors elicited from the C-SEQ were corroborated, namely Depth, Smoothness, Positivity, and Arousal. Thus, the C-SEQ is comprised of two dimensions of session evaluation, Depth and Smoothness, as well as two dimensions of postsession mood, Positivity and Arousal. The C-SEQ yields four factors. And intercorrelation among depth, smoothness and positivity of C-SEQ has been low to medium (rs=.16 -.64, ps＜.05). The internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach's α) of the four factors has been middle to high (α=.57-.87), and the total internal consistency of the C-SEQ has been high (α=.87). The C-SEQ is available as an instrument for counseling practice and research.