民法典“綠色化”與環境法典的調適

應對環境保護的需要，民法典需要在一定程度上修正其傳統。但是民法典仍應堅守其固有特質，對其“綠色化”應有限制。在民法典之外，需要依靠環境法律規範提供更為全面的綜合保護。我國目前環境法律規範已經蔚為大觀，但缺乏體系建構，對環境法治產生諸多不利影響，需要對其進行體系化。對我國而言，法典化是環境法律規範提升政治影響和發揮實際效用的最佳途徑。環境法規範的法典化與民法典不同，囿於其變動性和不成熟性，應以“適度化”為宜。民法典與環境法典應當實現對生態環境的“共治”：一方面，民法典通過妥當地融入環境保護理念以實現其應盡的環保功能；另一方面，環境法典通過相關規則的設置以實現與民法典整體的無縫銜接。

To cope with the need of environmental protection, the civil code needs to adjust itself to a certain extent. However, the civil code should stick to its inherent characteristics and limit its “greenization”. Beyond the civil code, we need to rely on environmental laws and regulations to provide more comprehensive protection. China's environmental laws and regulations have experienced tremendous development, but there is still a lack of system construction with many adverse effects on the rule of law. So we need to systematize them. For China, codification is the best way to enhance the political influence and give full force to the actual effect of environmental laws and regulations. The codification of environmental law is different from the civil code, however. Due to its variability and immaturity, it should be appropriate. The civil code and the environmental code should realize the “common governance” of the ecological environment: on the one hand, the civil code can be properly integrated into the concept of environmental protection to achieve the environmental protection function; on the other hand, the environmental code can achieve the seamless connection with the civil code through the setting of the relevant rules.